Do MT5 indicators make money on gold? A test of 1,144 combinations

We tested 1,144 combinations of popular MT5 indicators on gold (M5 and M15, 2012–2024). After broker costs, not one was profitable.

Written by: WICKVIPER Study ID: K158 / ZLOTO24-06 Published: Updated:

Drafted with AI tools. Editorial review: WickViper Team, 7 Oct 2026. Sources are listed at the end of the article.

Fails after costs

Short answer

Do popular MT5 indicators give an edge in short-term gold trading?

Not after costs. Of 1,144 combinations (EMA, MACD, RSI, Stochastic, CCI, Ichimoku, Bollinger, SAR, ADX…) none had a positive net result. The best one before costs made +0.40 bp per trade, and −1.73 bp on new data.

Data
XAUUSD, M5 and M15 candles
Period
2012–2024 (built on data to 2021, checked on 2022–2024)
Sample
1,144 rules: single indicators, pairs and triples, with and without an ADX filter
Costs
spread and commission measured on real trades, about 1.1 bp per trade

Key numbers

Rules tested
1,144
Profitable after costs
0
Median net result
−1.26 bp per trade
Median before costs
−0.14 bp

What exactly we tested

We took 12 indicators every MT5 terminal has: EMA20/50, EMA200, MACD in two settings, DI, Parabolic SAR, Ichimoku, the Bollinger middle band, RSI50, Stochastic, CCI and Momentum. We tested them alone, in pairs and in triples, on M5 and M15 candles, with and without an ADX > 25 trend filter — 1,144 rules in total. Entry: the moment the indicators newly line up in one direction. Exit: a target and a stop at 0.12% of price (about 5 USD on gold).

Result

Not one rule made money after costs. The median result before costs was −0.14 bp per trade — practically zero, even slightly negative: after indicators line up, price more often pulls back a little than keeps going. We checked the ten best rules from the build period on 2022–2024: all of them lost there.

Why

An indicator is past price, recalculated. When it is visible in every terminal in the world, the information in it is already in the price. On short moves (a few dollars on gold) the trading cost is several times larger than any edge you can squeeze out of that information.

What it means for a trader

  • A moving-average cross or an "oversold" RSI is not an edge on its own. If someone sells a strategy built only on indicators, ask for the result after costs over several years of data.
  • Indicators can help describe the market (trend, volatility), but the entry decision needs information that not everyone has.
  • For short-term strategies, trading costs decide the result more than the choice of indicator.

Limits

We tested one exit type (fixed target and stop), two timeframes and one instrument. Other exits and markets are covered in separate lab studies.

Questions

Does this mean indicators are useless?

As a stand-alone entry signal for short gold moves — in our test, yes. They can help describe the market, but they gave no edge after costs.

What cost did you assume?

Spread and commission measured on real trades with a broker, about 1.1 bp per trade in total (about 0.45 USD per ounce at a 4,150 USD gold price).

Would a higher timeframe be different?

Possibly — longer moves are larger relative to costs. That is a separate question we test in other studies.

Sources

  1. Historical data feed (tick and minute data) — Dukascopy Bank
  2. ESMA agrees to prohibit binary options and restrict CFDs to protect retail investors — ESMA

Past results do not guarantee future results. This is research, not a recommendation to trade.

All studies